ISO 14064-1 vs ISO 14064-3:
Understanding the Key Differences
Why Organizations Are Confused About ISO 14064-1 and ISO 14064-3
Organizations worldwide are under increasing pressure to Measure, Report, and Verify Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions Accurately. As a result, ISO 14064 has become one of the most referenced international standards for carbon accounting and verification.
However, one of the most common questions we encounter is:
What is the difference between ISO 14064-1 and ISO 14064-3 — and which one does my organization actually need?
This article clarifies the distinction, explains how the two standards work together, and helps organizations make informed decisions with confidence.
Understanding the ISO 14064 Family
ISO 14064 is not a single standard but a family of standards designed to support credible greenhouse gas management.
Two parts are especially relevant for organizations:
Although they are closely linked, they serve very different purposes.
What Is ISO 14064-1?
ISO 14064-1 specifies the principles and requirements for Quantifying and Reporting Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Removals at the Organizational Level.
In simple terms:
ISO 14064-1 is about building your carbon footprint correctly.
What ISO 14064-1 Covers
ISO 14064-1 guides organizations on how to:
Who ISO 14064-1 Is For
ISO 14064-1 is applicable to:
Importantly, ISO 14064-1 does not involve third-party verification. It defines how the organization calculates and reports emissions, not how those emissions are independently confirmed.
What Is ISO 14064-3?
ISO 14064-3 defines the requirements and principles for Verifying and Validating GHG Assertions.
In simple terms:
ISO 14064-3 is about checking whether your carbon footprint is credible.
What ISO 14064-3 Covers
ISO 14064-3 provides a structured framework for:
Unlike ISO 14064-1, ISO 14064-3 is used by independent verification bodies, not by organizations themselves.
Who ISO 14064-3 Is For
ISO 14064-3 is relevant to:
How ISO 14064-1 and ISO 14064-3 Work Together
A common misconception is that organizations must choose one or the other. In reality, they are designed to work together.
A typical pathway looks like this:






